TIME has a recent piece entitled "Fighting Crime by Reading Minds"--which discusses some interesting recent work in neuroscience and its potential for detecting lies, reading minds, and the like. It's worth the read even if I don't share Rosenfeld's desire to simply "get past all these theoretical arguments." On my view, side-stepping legitimate moral and political issues in the name of "simply doing science" is myopic given the historical abuses of science. This is not to say that scientists need to be beholden to these concerns, but they should nevertheless take them seriously lest we repeat some of the avoidable mistakes of the past.