09/06/2011

Taking Aim at Free Will

Kerri Smith
Nature

Scientists think they can prove that free will is an illusion.
Philosophers are urging them to think again.

Smith, Kerri. (2011), Taking Aim at Free Will. Nature: 1 Sept 2011, 477, 23-25.

Sep 6, 2011 1:54:36 PM | Free Will, Neurolaw

The comments to this entry are closed.

NEXT POST
9th Cir. Conference includes Neurolaw Expert Panel Four neurolaw experts spoke on “The Promises and Perils of Neuroscience Evidence in the Courtroom” at the Annual Conference of the U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, in Carlsbad, California, on August 16, 2011. The panel included Professors Owen Jones (Vanderbilt), Nita Farahany (Vanderbilt), Stephen Morse (Pennsylvania) and Hank Greely (Stanford). Before a large audience that included the Hon. Anthony Kennedy, Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, and the Hon. Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge of the 9th Circuit, the panelists provided a brief introduction to law-relevant neuroscience, summarized the growing use of neuroscientific evidence in the courtroom, and addressed...
PREVIOUS POST
Differential brain activity for Black and White faces predicts damage awards in hypothetical employment discrimination cases Harrison A. Korn, Micha A. Johnson, Marvin M. Chun Social Neuroscience Currently, potential jurors' racial biases are measured by explicit questioning––a poor measure because people often hide their views to adhere to social norms, and people have implicit views they are not consciously aware of. In this experiment, we investigated whether two alternative methods of measuring racial bias––a standard Black/White, good/bad Implicit Association Test (IAT) and neural activity, measured by fMRI, in response to seeing faces of Black and White individuals––could predict how much money subjects would award Black victims in hypothetical employment discrimination cases. IAT scores failed to predict...